Scientific
Modelling
SOCIO-pSYCHOLOGY: thE
MECHANISM of BEHAVIOR
in human INTERACTION.
A model mapped of scaling fields down to singular human to human interaction and reduction of population into two exclusive parties so to allow precision in analysis, delivery of definitive attributes of psyches during interaction (also as a party can only interact with one other party at any given time. )
–[ By dichotomic principles were elements in the map defined with a proposition in the epistomologies; delineations and it’s descriptions have therefore zero academic-accuracy / industrial-validity in default and should not be used or schooled as such. The dichotomies were derived with zero background in psychology, sociology, behavioral and the human sciences and as such may / does not speak in one’s understanding and / or as the actual psyche. ]–
PREMISE:The Two Parties
The cognitive function of a First-Person; a perceiver, is the experiencing of behavior, where observed behaviors are interpreted via the (2a) Internal-Filtering Process onto acknowledgment in qualia.
The Second-Person being the actor, manifests said behavior as a cognitive function, employing a (1a) Internal-Decision Processes which exhibits intrinsic desires onto outward behavior.
chapter 1a:The internal-decision process(of the 2nd person)
Priori to behavior is intention; emanating from deeper essentia, as determined by constitution and psychical state of an actor party being in question.
Intrinsic Desire
⌈ Heart ҂ Mind ⌉
X
⌊ Emotion ҂ Cognition ⌋
↯
conscious Intention
Thereupon as an actor party (amidst Internal-Decision Process), desires of Heart (sentimental) and Mind (mental) originates then react between the subXuncon.
This primarily subsequential and linear process is also qualitatively timed in degrees of awareness - from un to the sub to the conscious - as the Three Phases to Manifest.
chapter 1b:The three phases to manifest(the behavior)
It is only during the 2nd-Phase(through concession with current emotional/cognitive state) can a more consciously perceivable need/want be conditioned, due to effects in degree of awareness.
Configuration of an intent is formed by sub+con intervention and governance - the 3rd Phase.
unconscious Desire
subconscious audit in psyche constituents
X
subconscious approval with state of being
⍖
conscious Intention
↯
Exhibited Behavior
The party then determines proceedings of the configured conscious intention, if behaviors associating with said intention be manifested into an action - as exhibited behavior.
chapter 2a:The internal-filter process(of the 1st person)
The Internal Filtering Process is an operation comparable to the precursor model in The Process Flowchart of Knowledge Acquisition(navigate to article).
-
To "perceive", a party first receives empirical/sensory information from external sources
-
Then con+sub interprets the data.
-
Thereafter, by party's intuitive and logical sense and function
-
Comes interception of the incoming data with the psyche
-
Turning it into a valid/non-validation
-
Thus forming that interpretative(and collective) perception and sensation
-
And hereinafter is when partystarts to understand and make sense of an observation.
Thusly as methodize in degrees of cognizant intimacy, perceiving is stated by linear circumstantial development in the Three Phases of Experience.
chapter 2b:The three phases of experience(of the behavior)
From observation to acknowledgment:
-
↬Knowing (as continual influx of information)
-
↝Understanding (with party's experiential concordance)
-
↦Accepting (by conceptual compliance [in psyche])
-[Common cognitive biases predominantly happen during the 2nd Phase of Experiencing; whereas during interception, an observable does not conform with discreet or instinctual judgment/inherent beliefs lay by a person for this concern (when psyche doesn’t "accommodate"), accordingly, a said observable then stalls between the Knowing and Understanding; the sub+conscious as invalidated junk.]-
Else comes acknowledgment in qualia (for behaviors) as 3rd Phase of Experience; accepting.
The party then determines proceedings for the acknowledged observable, and can then choose to react as an Actor - for this is how human interactions are played out.
chapter 3:Transference constraints(UPON INTERACTION)
Besides diversion from correctness or certainty by cognitive bias, constraints in information and behavioral transference during human interaction also diffuses perception and interrupts harmony, ex post facto hurting the punctilio of whatsoever cordial, societal or political amity.
These constraints are identified as problems in Deterministic҂Empiricism, with Linguistic Determinism in particular.
↝ Empiricism - of experience
Attribution of behavioral (reflex-reactions) patterns and faults to;-
a.Cultural / social determinism
(conditioning)
b.Genetic determinism
(make-up)
c.Environmental determinism
(stimulus-response)
d.Psychological determinism
(personality, the ego, childhood issues)
↦ Determinism - of causation
Empirical impossibility in transference of feelings, thoughts, perceptions being;-
a.PROBLEMS IN PURE SENSORY EXPERIENCE
(WHAT IS REAL?)
b.DENIAL/REJECTION OF EXPERIENTIAL VALIDITY
(IN OWN OR BY OTHERS)
c.COGNITIVE BIAS BY SENSORY ACQUISITION
(YOU SEE WHAT YOU WANT TO SEE)
d.THE "ORTHODOXY" FATALITY
(ANDECDOTAL-BASED TRUTHS)
↯Linguistic Determinism - of meaning
Incomplete acquisition of knowledge and defective transference of information by;-
a.Errors in speech / text / translation
B.Unsound knowledge
C.Limits IN language -eloquencY/ineffability
D.ET AL.constraints -IN semantics/etymology
E.AND OTHER tOPICS iN linguistic rELATIVITY
⌢
-------⍽--------
-------⍽--------
⌵⎶⊢----
§
Site Title
-------⍽--------
Such impediments upon the inter-human relation - during communication; as behavior - broadens what compelling indifference humanity already marginalizes in as deviating further into genealogical, ancestral, cultural, economical, inter alia, psychological discordance.