top of page

the Mechanism of Behavior in

Human Interaction

TITLE:-

⌈ elements in this model were derivatives byn principles in the epistomologies and descriptions hereinafer contains no academic-accuracy / industrial-validity by default and should not be used or schooled as such ⌿ the delineation thence may-does not speak by technicalities ⌋

/- a model mapped of scaling fields down to singular human to human interaction and reduction of population into two exclusive parties so to allow delivery of definitive attributes of the psyche during interaction (and as a party can interact with only one other party at any given time).

preview:-

premise:

intro - the two parties

The cognitive function of a First-Person; a Perceiver, is the Experiencing of a Behavior, where observed behaviors are interpreted via the [12]Internal-Filtering Process onto acknowledgment in qualia.

 

The Second-Person being the Actor, Manifests said Behavior as a cognitive function, employing a [1A]Internal-Decision Processes which exhibits intrinsic desires onto outward behavior.

internal dynamics of the 2nd person

proposition:

[1A] Precondition to Behavior is always the Intention, where amidst Internal-Decision Process, desires [of the acting party] of the Heart (sentimental) and Mind (mental)  emanate from deeper essentia. 

Thereafter reacting between the sub + unconcious and thusly forming said Intention(as determined by the Psychical Constituents + State of Being in question).

​

​Psychical Constituents = Heart x Mind

State of Being = Emotion x Cognition

This primarily subsequential and linear process can also qualitatively timed in Degrees of Awareness - from un to the sub to the conscious - as the Three Phases to Manifest.

[1b]  It is only during the 2nd-Phase can a more consciously perceivable need / want be conditioned due to Degrees of Awareness.

​

Degree of Awareness = un > sub > conscious

​

With the configuration of intent formed by sub + con intervention and governance (as the 3rd Phase) the Party then determine proceedings of the conscious intention - if behaviors associating with said intention be manifested into an action - as exhibited behavior.

proposition:

internal dynamics of the 1st person

[2A]  The Internal Filtering Process is an operation comparable to the precursor model in The Process Flowchart of Knowledge Acquisition (navigate to article).

  1. To "perceive", a party first receives empirical/sensory information from external sources

  2. Then con+sub interprets the data

  3. Thereafter, by party's intuitive and logical sense and function

  4. Comes interception of the incoming data with the psyche

  5. Turning it into a valid/non-validation

  6. Thus forming interpretative(collective) perception + sensation

  7. And thereinafter is when party starts to understand and make sense of an observation.

Thusly as methodize in degrees of cognizant intimacy, perceiving is stated by linear circumstantial development in the Three Phases of Experience.

[2b] From observation to acknowledgment in the Three Phases of Experience: 

 

1.) ↬Knowing

(as continual influx of information) 

​

2.) ↝Understanding

(with party's   experiential concordance)

​

3.) ↦Accepting

(by conceptual compliance [in psyche])

[Common cognitive biases predominantly happen during the 2nd Phase of Experiencing; whereas during interception, an observable does not conform with discreet or instinctual judgment/inherent beliefs lay by a person for this concern (when psyche doesn’t "accommodate"), accordingly, a said observable then stalls between the Knowing and Understanding; the sub+conscious as invalidated junk.]

 

Else comes acknowledgment in qualia (for behaviors) as 3rd Phase of Experience; accepting.

 

The party then determines proceedings for the acknowledged observable, and can then choose to react as an Actor - for this is how human interactions are played out. 

Besides diversion from correctness or certainty by cognitive bias, constraints in information and behavioral transference during human interaction also diffuses perception and interrupts harmony, ex post facto hurting the punctilio of whatsoever cordial, societal or political amity.

 

These constraints are identified as problems in Deterministic҂Empiricism, with Linguistic Determinism in particular.

bottom of page